Business News Agency August 17th With the “Fluoride Brightener Safety Expert Media Meeting for Detergents†held on August 2, 9 people came from toxicology, medicine, fluorescent whitening agents, detergents, textiles and Experts in the field of dye research on the "argument" of the safety of fluorescent whitening agents, the debate about the optical brighteners in laundry detergent seems to have settled. The reporter saw that on the shelves of major supermarkets, the blue moon laundry liquid was still placed in a conspicuous position. Consumers did not seem to have any worries before. They chose to buy the most cost-effective products they thought of in the liquid laundry shelves. Do not care whether it contains fluorescent brighteners.
The additional lawsuit liquid laundry liquid is actually a "declaration" of the dye liquid "a statement" suspected of false advertising "consumers are not memorable" as the pusher to push the blue moon to the whirlpool center of this fluorescent whitening agent. The sea is not as "forgetful" as the average consumer. He did not intend to let go, but planned to continue to die with the Blue Moon.
Recently, in an interview with the Morning Post reporter, he said that he will directly serve as the plaintiff, adding another two lawsuits against the Blue Moon laundry detergent. In previous lawsuits, his status was an agent.
The first point of the additional lawsuit, Wang Hai believes that the laundry detergent with fluorescent brightener has already had the dyeing function. "Fluorescent whitening agent is a kind of dye that has no decontamination effect. Light-colored clothing will be discolored by the effect of fluorescent whitening agent to form stains. The laundry detergent added with fluorescent whitening agent already has a dyeing function and is no longer The pure liquid detergent has become a dyeing solution.The Blue Moon promoted and marked the dyeing solution as a laundry detergent, concealing the function of the dyeing clothes and intended to conceal the fluorescent brightener from consumers because the fluorescent function was marked after the dyeing function. Brighteners must be marked as the main raw material for chemical poisons and dyeing."
The evidence supporting this view is that Japanese garments will have warning signs on the washing labels to remind consumers not to use laundry detergents containing fluorescent brighteners in light-colored clothes. He showed reporters the Japanese brands Muji and Uniqlo's water-washing marks that were shot on mobile phones. The Japanese-Chinese and Chinese-labeled “washed-color products†do not use lotions containing fluorescent brighteners. Affected by the fluorescent brightener will change color. Please be careful not to form a stain warning.
"I consulted a lot of sellers selling laundry detergent imported from Japan on Taobao, but I did not find one that added fluorescent whitening agents. Japanese clothing labels light-colored products do not use lotions containing fluorescent brighteners, so it can be inferred that Japan If the liquid detergent contains fluorescent brightener, it must be marked, otherwise the warning on the clothes is meaningless."
Later, in the information released on August 10th, Wang Hai found more specific evidence. He pointed out that Japan's lion liquid laundry detergent also emphasizes “non-fluorescent agentsâ€. He even made it clear that most Japanese laundry liquids are With "non-complex fluorescence agent" as a selling point.
Refers to "Fluorescent Brightener Expert Meeting" as "Slapstick"
Another additional litigation is Wang Hai's view that the advertisements of the Blue Moon released in many forms in various newspaper media are suspected of being “illegalâ€. As for the previous “Expert Meeting for Security of Fluorescent Brighteners for Detergentsâ€, Wang Hai used the term “farce drama†to describe it.
“First of all, according to its constitution, China Laundry Industry Association has absolutely no qualification and ability to quantify the safety of fluorescent brighteners, knowing that they do not have the qualification to identify but advocating fluorescent whitening agents for safety and environmental protection is a fraud. The so-called experts involved are basically stakeholders in the detergent-related industry, and their arguments are not credibility in themselves.In addition, please pay special attention to the so-called experts participating in the activities of the China Laundry Industry Association during normal working hours. It's just a personal point of view, not the unit where it is located." Wang Hai said that if necessary, he may also add additional lawsuits to these experts.
The additional lawsuit liquid laundry liquid is actually a "declaration" of the dye liquid "a statement" suspected of false advertising "consumers are not memorable" as the pusher to push the blue moon to the whirlpool center of this fluorescent whitening agent. The sea is not as "forgetful" as the average consumer. He did not intend to let go, but planned to continue to die with the Blue Moon.
Recently, in an interview with the Morning Post reporter, he said that he will directly serve as the plaintiff, adding another two lawsuits against the Blue Moon laundry detergent. In previous lawsuits, his status was an agent.
The first point of the additional lawsuit, Wang Hai believes that the laundry detergent with fluorescent brightener has already had the dyeing function. "Fluorescent whitening agent is a kind of dye that has no decontamination effect. Light-colored clothing will be discolored by the effect of fluorescent whitening agent to form stains. The laundry detergent added with fluorescent whitening agent already has a dyeing function and is no longer The pure liquid detergent has become a dyeing solution.The Blue Moon promoted and marked the dyeing solution as a laundry detergent, concealing the function of the dyeing clothes and intended to conceal the fluorescent brightener from consumers because the fluorescent function was marked after the dyeing function. Brighteners must be marked as the main raw material for chemical poisons and dyeing."
The evidence supporting this view is that Japanese garments will have warning signs on the washing labels to remind consumers not to use laundry detergents containing fluorescent brighteners in light-colored clothes. He showed reporters the Japanese brands Muji and Uniqlo's water-washing marks that were shot on mobile phones. The Japanese-Chinese and Chinese-labeled “washed-color products†do not use lotions containing fluorescent brighteners. Affected by the fluorescent brightener will change color. Please be careful not to form a stain warning.
"I consulted a lot of sellers selling laundry detergent imported from Japan on Taobao, but I did not find one that added fluorescent whitening agents. Japanese clothing labels light-colored products do not use lotions containing fluorescent brighteners, so it can be inferred that Japan If the liquid detergent contains fluorescent brightener, it must be marked, otherwise the warning on the clothes is meaningless."
Later, in the information released on August 10th, Wang Hai found more specific evidence. He pointed out that Japan's lion liquid laundry detergent also emphasizes “non-fluorescent agentsâ€. He even made it clear that most Japanese laundry liquids are With "non-complex fluorescence agent" as a selling point.
Refers to "Fluorescent Brightener Expert Meeting" as "Slapstick"
Another additional litigation is Wang Hai's view that the advertisements of the Blue Moon released in many forms in various newspaper media are suspected of being “illegalâ€. As for the previous “Expert Meeting for Security of Fluorescent Brighteners for Detergentsâ€, Wang Hai used the term “farce drama†to describe it.
“First of all, according to its constitution, China Laundry Industry Association has absolutely no qualification and ability to quantify the safety of fluorescent brighteners, knowing that they do not have the qualification to identify but advocating fluorescent whitening agents for safety and environmental protection is a fraud. The so-called experts involved are basically stakeholders in the detergent-related industry, and their arguments are not credibility in themselves.In addition, please pay special attention to the so-called experts participating in the activities of the China Laundry Industry Association during normal working hours. It's just a personal point of view, not the unit where it is located." Wang Hai said that if necessary, he may also add additional lawsuits to these experts.
A Workstation sink is a sink with a mechanism built in to the front and back sides of the bowl to allow accessories to sit on the step or ledge, affording the user to prepare meals on the sink instead of on the countertop. The intent behind the design is to speed up the process of food preparation and clean-up.
Workstation Sink,Farmhouse Workstation Sink,Work Station Kitchen Sink,Workstation Farmhouse Sink
JIANGMEN MEIAO KITCHEN AND BATH CO.,LTD , https://www.meiaogroup.com